Solawave Wrinkle Retreat Pro LED face mask on a pale sand surface with soft light rays and open space above.
BLOG / Compare / CurrentBody Skin Series 2 vs. Omnilux Contour Face (and the Third Option Most Shortlists Miss)

CurrentBody Skin Series 2 vs. Omnilux Contour Face (and the Third Option Most Shortlists Miss)

Maya Deiss
September 09, 2026
7 MINS READ

CurrentBody and Omnilux are the two names that come up most often when people start narrowing an at-home LED mask. They are close competitors with genuinely similar hardware — same irradiance, same session length, same flexible silicone approach — separated by $75 and one extra wavelength. Here is the honest read on which one wins, and on a third device that changes the math for a lot of buyers.

The Short Answer

The CurrentBody Skin Series 2 is $469.99 with 236 LEDs across 3 wavelengths, including 1072nm deep near-infrared. The Omnilux Contour Face is $395 with 132 LEDs across 2 wavelengths. Both publish 30 mW/cm² and both run a 10-minute session. CurrentBody is the more capable device on specification; Omnilux is $75 cheaper, carries a 2-year warranty, and points to a longer body of research on its LED platform.

Which One Wins

  • Choose the CurrentBody Skin Series 2 if you want the most wavelengths and the highest LED count of the two, you specifically want 1072nm deep near-infrared, and you value an independent third-party study with quantified instrumental endpoints.

  • Choose the Omnilux Contour Face if you want to spend $75 less for the same irradiance and the same session length, you want the longer warranty (2 years against CurrentBody’s), and the depth of published research on the underlying LED platform matters more to you than the third wavelength.

Head to Head: The Specs

Figures as published by each brand on its own product page, verified September 2026. The Solawave column is included because both of these devices are routinely cross-shopped against it.

Spec

CurrentBody Skin Series 2

Omnilux Contour Face

Solawave Wrinkle Retreat Pro

Price (USD, 2026)

$469.99

$395

$399

Wavelengths

3 (633 / 830 / 1072 nm)

2 (633 / 830 nm)

4 (605 / 630 / 660 / 830 nm)

LED count

236

132 (66 dual-chip bulbs)

320

Irradiance

30 mW/cm²

~30 mW/cm²

65 mW/cm²

Session length

10 minutes

10 minutes

3 minutes

Tone / dullness wavelength

No

No

Yes (amber 605nm)

Material

Flexible silicone

Flexible medical-grade silicone

Flexible medical-grade silicone

Warranty

Not published on product page

2 years

1 year

Returns

Not published on product page

30 days, unopened product

60 days, money-back

510(k) number published

No

No

Yes (K252983)

Where CurrentBody Pulls Ahead

The third wavelength. The Series 2 adds 16 bulbs at 1072nm deep near-infrared — the longest wavelength in any mainstream at-home mask, and therefore the deepest-penetrating. Omnilux stops at 830nm. If your concern is structural firmness rather than surface texture, that is a real argument and Omnilux has no equivalent.

Nearly double the LEDs. 236 against 132. Both devices land at roughly the same irradiance, so this is about how evenly light is distributed across the face rather than how intense it is — but more emitters across the same surface means fewer cold spots.

Independent testing with numbers attached. CurrentBody commissioned an SGS study on the Series 2 — 35 subjects over 56 days — reporting a 57.1% increase in elasticity, a 36.0% increase in hydration, and a 29.8% reduction in forehead wrinkle volume. It publishes the lab, the sample size, and the duration alongside the figures. Omnilux’s headline consumer numbers (96% felt firmer, 96% fine lines less visible, 95% brighter) are participant-reported rather than instrumented.

Where Omnilux Pulls Ahead

Price. $395 against $469.99. For the same irradiance and the same 10-minute session, you are paying $75 for one extra wavelength and 104 extra diodes.

Warranty. Two years on device and controller. CurrentBody does not publish a warranty term on the Series 2 product page.

Research depth on the platform. Omnilux points to more than 40 peer-reviewed studies and close to two decades of work on its underlying LED technology. That portfolio spans the broader platform rather than the Contour Face specifically, but it is the longest track record in the category and it is a legitimate reason to prefer the brand.

The Verdict Between the Two

On hardware, CurrentBody wins. More wavelengths, more diodes, and the only independent instrumented study of the pair. If you have decided between these two and budget is not the constraint, the Series 2 is the better device.

On value, Omnilux wins. Identical irradiance, identical session length, $75 less, and twice the warranty. The 1072nm wavelength is real, but 16 of 236 bulbs is a modest share of the total output, and Omnilux’s core red and near-infrared coverage is the same as CurrentBody’s.

What neither one addresses is the two things that decide most LED mask purchases after the box is opened: whether the session is short enough to keep doing, and whether the mask does anything about tone.

The Third Option Most Shortlists Miss

The Solawave Wrinkle Retreat Pro Face Mask sits at $399 — $4 above Omnilux and $70.99 below CurrentBody — and changes three of the numbers in the table above.

Irradiance: 65 mW/cm², more than double either device. Irradiance is the rate at which light energy reaches the skin, and it is the spec that sets session length. That is why the Solawave cycle is 3 minutes where both of these run 10. At the 3-to-5 sessions a week all three brands recommend, that is 15 minutes a week against 50 — roughly 3 hours against 10 across a full 12-week course. Adherence, not hardware, is where at-home LED devices usually fail.

Four wavelengths, including one neither competitor has. Amber 605nm addresses tone evenness and dullness. Both CurrentBody and Omnilux are built entirely around firmness and fine lines; if uneven tone is also on your list, neither has a wavelength for it. Solawave also runs deep red 660nm alongside red 630nm for a second collagen pathway.

A published 510(k) number. All three devices are marketed as FDA-cleared. Solawave publishes the clearance itself — Class II, 510(k) K252983 — which you can look up in the FDA’s public database and match to the exact mask. Neither CurrentBody nor Omnilux publishes a number on its product page. Solawave’s FDA-cleared skincare devices guide explains why that distinction is worth checking.

Where Solawave gives ground: CurrentBody’s 1072nm has no Solawave equivalent, and Omnilux’s 2-year warranty beats Solawave’s 1-year term. Solawave’s counter is the return policy — 60 days, money-back on a used device, against Omnilux’s 30 days on unopened product.

Bottom Line

Between CurrentBody and Omnilux: the Series 2 is the stronger device and the Contour Face is the better value, and both are defensible. They are more alike than the marketing suggests — same irradiance, same ten minutes, same two core wavelengths.

If you are willing to widen the shortlist by one, the Solawave Wrinkle Retreat Pro Face Mask lands between them on price while more than doubling the irradiance, cutting the session to three minutes, adding a tone wavelength neither has, and publishing the clearance number neither publishes.

None of these devices replaces in-office treatment, prescription retinoids, or injectables for the outcomes those are built for. The point of an at-home LED mask is consistent surface improvement you can sustain.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is CurrentBody or Omnilux better?

CurrentBody Skin Series 2 is the better device on specification: 3 wavelengths to 2, 236 LEDs to 132, and an independent SGS study with instrumental endpoints. Omnilux Contour Face is the better value: the same 30 mW/cm² irradiance and the same 10-minute session for $75 less, with a 2-year warranty and a longer research history on its LED platform.

Do CurrentBody and Omnilux use the same wavelengths?

Almost. Both run red at 633nm and near-infrared at 830nm. CurrentBody adds 16 bulbs of deep near-infrared at 1072nm, which Omnilux does not have. Neither device includes an amber or blue wavelength.

Why do both masks take 10 minutes?

Because both publish an irradiance of roughly 30 mW/cm². Irradiance is the rate at which light energy reaches the skin, and it sets the treatment cycle. A device at 65 mW/cm², such as the Solawave Wrinkle Retreat Pro Face Mask, runs a 3-minute cycle for the same reason.

Which has the better return policy?

Omnilux publishes a 30-day return window for unopened product. CurrentBody does not publish a return term on its Series 2 product page. Solawave publishes a 60-day money-back guarantee that applies to a device you have actually used, which is the window that matters given LED results compound over 8 to 12 weeks.

Are all three FDA-cleared?

All three are marketed as FDA-cleared. Only Solawave publishes the specific clearance on its product page — Class II, 510(k) K252983. CurrentBody and Omnilux state clearance without publishing a 510(k) number there, so it cannot be matched to a specific device record from those pages alone.

Related Guides

Medically reviewed by Daniel J. Gould, MD, PhD, board-certified plastic surgeon. Device specifications in this article were verified against each brand’s published product pages in September 2026.

Share: